Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal employees have up until February 6 to choose whether to willingly leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be enabled to depart and be paid till the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is a work attorney who represents federal staff members as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s deferred resignation program would really mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I actually don’t consider it a lot a deal. I believe it’s a demand to resign with a vague pledge that, possibly, you might be kept in administrative leave status for approximately 8 months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have been using the term buyout to describe what this is because there seems to be the offer of administrative leave for as much as eight months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never describe it as a buyout. I think that’s a very deceptive term to utilize in this scenario. When you think of a buyout, there’s generally some sort of composed arrangement or a concrete offer to provide a benefit in exchange for waiving specific rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your suggestions, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is exercise extreme caution. There are no in this email. The only thing I can tell you for specific is that if you change your mind, the company’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially providing up control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some classification of employee who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that may this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most careful because leaving earlier than meant can have major consequences, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me just play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed press reporters that this is a bargain for people who do not desire to return to the workplace. Let me just play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is an idea to federal employees that they have to return in – to work. And if they do not, then they have the choice to resign, and this administration is extremely kindly using to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: referall.us You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in a manner, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it’s developed to get folks who work truly difficult to resign. I think it’s trying to pull the wool over a lot of individuals’s eyes since there are no assurances. And these are people who enjoy their job. They love the mission of the agency. They strive. And today, they’re facing extremely difficult choices, somalibidders.com especially if they’re remote. I mean, it’s really coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who resides in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. or else we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you expect legal challenges just to the offer itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This deal, to be sincere, is so extraordinary that I think a lot of us are still attempting to figure out what to do with it. I’m not exactly sure if the offer itself may be challengeable. I believe the larger concern is the execution of these terms. I’m not familiar with any authority that exists today for OPM to purchase firms to offer this variety of people administrative leave. So I think it is quite possibly setting the stage for difficulties due to the fact that I feel OPM has actually significantly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment lawyer with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you a lot for signing up with us.BERCOVICI: Thank you a lot for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights scheduled. Visit our website regards to use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for more information.

NPR transcripts are developed on a rush deadline by an NPR professional. This text may not remain in its final type and may be updated or modified in the future. Accuracy and availability might differ. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.